Showing posts with label Columbus Museum of Art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Columbus Museum of Art. Show all posts

Sunday, May 31, 2015

Holocaust Memories from Rural Poland: Esther Nisenthal Krinitz at the Columbus Museum of Art

Black and white are the colors of the Holocaust. The black and white starkness of documentary images result simply from the available technology of the 1940s. Respectful subdued tones follow suit as if to add color would be to pile unbearable sensation onto images and memories already overwhelming in color-drained grayscale.
Esther Nisenthal Krinitz, Swimming in the River, 1978. Embroidery on linen. Art and Remembrance.
So I was surprised when I walked into the gallery where Fabric of Survival: The Art of Esther Nisenthal Krinitz is showing at the Columbus Museum of Art until June 14. Filled with textiles detailing the memories of a Holocaust survivor, the room is alive with bucolic scenes of nature sewn from vari-colored fabric, crewel, and embroidery threads. Krinitz's hand-sewn tableaux feature Polish village life and landscape—backgrounds durable enough in memory to have survived all that the Nazis perpetrated; scenes in which the Nazis in fact seem dwarfed by the fields and forests around them. 

These scenes of rivers, grain, and gardens remained vivid enough that when Krinitz began recording her childhood at age fifty, the horrors remained contained in images of a world much larger than the certainty of the death that only she and her sister, out of the whole family, escaped.

The tapestry above was the first she made, in 1978. She recollects her childhood home before the war. She and her brother swim in the river while their sisters look on. The villagers come and go about their tasks, and benign Nature dominates. Her house is big and solid, the size of a castle. It doesn't matter that Krinitz was fifty when she made this, for it is a picture of what the child still alive in her left behind. 

This is the picture of home that is fundamental to personality and to character, the image that each of us harbors at some level. The top portion is linear and structured; the bottom is curvaceous and flowing. The whole is both stable and relaxed. The naive image has little artifice and an abundance of unfiltered, joyous expression.

During the 1970s, Krinitz originally made several pieces with subject matter like this, drawn from pre-war memories of Polish village life, where Jews and Gentiles lived side-by-side. She records memories of matzoh-making, of walking to holiday ceremonies on stilts that her brother made: The pleasure of simple, pre-industrial, pre-electrical, agricultural life ordered by the combination of seasonal and religious community observations. 
Esther Nisenthal Krinitz, The Bees Save Me, 1996. Art and Remembrance.
After a long hiatus, Krinitz returned to her project in the 1990s, finally moving into the darkening story of her early adolescence and the arrival of the Nazis. Several of the Krinitz textiles show the indignities of Nazi sadism. She depicts soldiers cutting the beard off her grandfather; arousing the family in their nightclothes at gunpoint while neighbors gawked; marching Jewish boys off to forced labor where they were shot when depleted; and, finally, rounding up the Jews from among their neighbors for transport to death camps. 

Esther and her thirteen year old sister fled (the rest of the family was killed). They survived by speaking only Polish and pretending they knew no German (closely related to their native Yiddish). They disguised themselves to find work for an elderly couple in a nearby village. In the scene above, Esther works in the garden that the old man to allowed her to plant. One day Nazis came and tried to question her. She explains in the embroidered caption: 

"June 1943 in Grabowka. While I was tending the garden I had planted, two Nazi soldiers appeared and began to talk to me. I couldn't let them know that I understood them, so I just shook my head as they spoke. Dziadek, the old farmer who had taken me in as his housekeeper, came to stand watch near by, but the honey bees rescued me first, suddenly swarming around the soldiers. "Why aren't they stinging you?" the soldiers asked Dziadek as they ran out of the garden."

Take away the rifles, take away the caption, and what distinguishes these two scenes, made almost twenty years apart, first when the artist was 50 and then approaching 70? 

The first, the pre-war memory, is quite specific—each of the five siblings is located, the house is recalled in loving detail—yet it is mythic too. It is an undatable memory of golden childhood. Esther's memory could be of life at four or fourteen. It is a recollection of well-being, innocence, stability, and love—a memory of place as feeling. Many adults recall such an idyll of childhood. But few recall the idyll's interruption by such sudden and complete trauma as Krinitz was to experience.

The pre-war scene is actually a tapestry. Every bit of the linen is covered with crewel embroidery so that the surface is entirely worked with stitches. Every inch of the surface has been touched and transformed by the artist's hand. The ideas of caressing and modeling come with this. It's not only a scene she recalls, but one she has invented as well—one she has caused to appear, and to appear just as she wants to remember it. She is its author. 

The picture of her as an adolescent—no longer a girl, shoved into untimely adulthood—is not a tapestry. The sky, the "earth" of the garden and some other areas are simple fabric underpinning. The plants in the garden have been sewn in place by embroidery or appliqué; the bees, the flowers, the details of the figures, but the surface has not been as carefully stroked. In contrast to the first picture, it is entirely lined up. The importance of order at this stage in the girl's life was paramount. Even the bees on their hives rest in lines. Krinitz has made up this scene too. She has authored this scene not to refresh herself, but as a way to diffuse trauma.

More of the artist's time and attention have gone into a substantial narrative below the image the explains what might otherwise elude the viewer. She interprets the picture for us to be sure we know what she felt and how Nature continued to aid her.

The second image is remarkable for the way a survivor of great trauma pictures herself coping. The human figures—both the good and bad ones—remain small in the largely natural scene. She is located off to the side. She seems to mediate her own feelings of fear by spreading all possible feeling through the natural landscape, like healing wounds with resort to the earth. Even the bees, massing around the hives and buzzing around the soldiers, appear insignificant in the grand scheme of the picture. Krinitz controls her panic and fear by telling the story, controlling the context and perspective, and placing herself in a large framework.

Esther Nisehnthal Krinitz, Ordered to Leave Our Homes, 1993.
Embroidery and fabric collage. Art and Remembrance.
"This was my family on the morning of October 15, 1942. We were ordered by the Gestapo to leave our homes by 10 a.m. to join all the other Jews on the road to Crasnik railroad station and then to their death." 

This wall hanging, in narrative sequence previous to the one above, pictures Esther's recollection of the day her family had to face their impending deportation to the camps. This is a family portrait, undiluted by the presence of their killers. This was the day that Esther and her sister, in red, would flee. 

Of the thirty-six pieces Krinitz made, this is one of the least dense in terms of sewing. The fabric background is largely plain cloth with a few large swathes of appliqué. Huge crows hunch on the housetop, symbols of impending death for the black-clad quintet.Two outsized sunflowers bloom for the escaping girls in their red capes.

Dark colors signify the grievous content of this picture but its momentous content is signaled by the size and forthright positioning of the family and the house. Nature does not soften or disguise emotion; if anything, it underscores the tragedy. Krinitz does not caress or decorate this image with thousands of strokes of her needle. In terms of presenting the most traumatic event of her life—a moment where she could be emotionally frozen forever—she is if brief, still heroically direct. In naive art, to place the figures near the bottom of the picture is to locate them in the most important place. It's to ground them, as children do in crayon drawings. This is the drawing that stays forever on the parents' wall, the treasured picture of the family, drawn by the daughter with a heart full of love. From this instant forward, Esther would be her own mother and her sister's. In her seventies, mother and child, she recounts the story of how this came to be. 
Esther Nisenthal Krinitz, Granddaughter, 1999. Embroidery and fabric collage.
Art and Remembrance.

The final image in both the series and this show pictures a little girl who raises her arm to examine the trunk of a stout tree in a beautiful garden. The lawn, the bark, the flowers, the girl's hair—all are elaborately embroidered. They are touched all over with a loving, lingering hand. Krinitz has brought her story sequentially through the war years and her visit to the camp where her family was killed, a harrowing scene even in naif stitchery. She details and names the piles of ashes, the gas chambers, the burnt down home of the camp director. Aside from the girl's pigtails and dress, there is nothing bright in the meticulously catalogued scene.

In this final scene, she has lived a long life in Brooklyn with her husband whom she met in a refugee camp, with her daughters, and now celebrates her granddaughter, joyous in nature. There is an attempt at observational representation her; she has moved beyond the grip of memory and the burden of interpretation into a real and safe present. The girl is little and the tree next to her is really enormous; there is actual scale and it feels reassuring. The border is green, the text is white: "When you were three years old dear Mami Sheine, Grandma came to visit you. We went to a park where you discovered a huge tree. I never forgot the expression on your face as you stood there admiring the tree. Grandma loves you so much." 

Grandma is free and insures that she will be part of another little girl's strength, no matter what comes.

Friday, January 16, 2015

At the Columbus Museum of Art, Artists Making Money.

In——We Trust: Art and Money is a broad and often amusing show at the Columbus Museum of Art, continuing through February. How does a curator focus a show anchored by two words with such culturally potent and complex meanings? Art? Money? Tyler McCann, Columbus's new associate curator for contemporary art, offers us a show of almost bewildering inclusiveness. Because only a few images from the show are available, I'll print them in this review to give the reader an idea of the variety of work displayed. I want to focus, though, on the theme I was most interested in, which is artists and how their practices relate to commerce.
Paul Ramírez Jonas, We Make Change, 2008 (detail).
 Penny press machine, oak, plexiglass, one penny from each year
 minted from 1909–2008. Photography: Paul Ramírez Jonas.

 Courtesy the artist and Koenig & Clinton, New York.

In the show's opening position is Andy Warhol's wonderful little painting of both sides of a two-dollar bill, lent by the Dayton  Art Institute. Warhol made it in response to the exhortation to paint what he liked. That would be money, wouldn't it? Warhol was a master draftsman, and there's a pencil drawing of $5 banknotes that communicates the controlled emotion one feels in master drawings of the nude. The wonderful thing about his money portraits  is that they are both careful in their representation and fresh in their expressiveness: His self-awareness is clear, but there's also an innocence too that asks to be taken seriously.

Why shouldn't the artist want to make money? Everyone else does. Are his skill and his creativity in opposition to a goal shared by every normal person in society? Must he only represent money? Who decides that he is above the rest of society?


Cildo Meireles, Zero-Dollar Bill, 1978/2013. Image courtesy the artist. 
Photo copyright Pat Kilgore.
Sarah Cain, in a charming selections from a work named "$ forty three," 2012, shows several individually framed dollar bills over which she has painted brilliantly colored geometrical designs that favor equilateral triangles. We come to understand the triangles as pyramids when close inspection demonstrates that on some of the bills she has not painted over the currency's pyramid topped by the glowing eye. Aside from the suggestion in her title, this is the only detail that reveals the fact that she has actually painted on legal tender. 

Cain paints so comprehensively that sometimes only the tiny glowing eye itself peeks through. It is then the merest speck in the field of color; it's easy to overlook entirely. 

On a one-dollar bill, the motto inscribed above the configuration of the pyramid and beaming eye is "Annuit Coeptis," roughly, "providence/god shines on our undertakings." We historically understand "our" to be the republic's. 

Cain removes the providential eye from its monetary setting and places it in a field of exotic color and design. As such, it becomes the reverse of an evil eye talisman. The eye of god shines out with a hopeful message: Prosperity for the artist? Increased creative potency? It seems that Cain re-values money and condenses its power to a capacity that inspires and bring good things to pass.
Superflex, Bankrupt Banks, 2008 – present, banners:
paint on fabric, 79 x 79 inches; panels: vinyl on painted MDF,
79 x 39.5 inches, Coppel Collection, photo courtesy Nils Staerk
 and Fundación Jumex Arte Contemporáneo.

On the theme of artists and money, I found the most poignant and amusing works to be two from Caleb Larsen. Fortunately both of these are pictured with captions on his website, linked above. Do look them up.

"$10,000 Sculpture in Progress" a modest piece from 2009, is a dollar-bill acceptor set into the wall. It's just like the one on a Coca-Cola dispenser or candy machine, covered with a sticker noting that it accepts "$1 & $5." The direction to Insert bill Here is illustrated with a hand holding a dollar bill in the proper position. The gallery note provided by Larsen suggests that when $10,000 is collected, then he will produce the work. What could be clearer about the connection between art and money? 

Meschac GABA, Bankivi: Housing Bank, 2014,
 Wood, decommissioned Central African (CFA)
franc banknotes, plexiglas, assorted coins 
 
The acceptor works, by the way. I made a donation, which it sucked right up. Being myself the recipient of largesse, I'll donate to any artist who asks. For all I know, he's on this third project by now. More power to him. But I feel confident that many react to this as to a scam: "If he's got work in the museum, he's not hurting!" Oh, if only. This work is another way of measuring public perceptions of how art is financed. It measures our illusions, assumptions, and prejudices about who artists are—tricksters? malingerers? I would love to see a follow up to this piece. Did museum goers react to it as to a piece of rhetoric? Or as a statement from a working artist?

Next to "$10,000 Sculpture in Progess" hangs a framed document, letter-press printed on fine paper, also by Larson, titled "The financial footprint of the artistic practice," 2009. This is its text: "On this date the undersigned Collector agrees to transfer the total credit card debt the artist Caleb Larsen has incurred as a result of maintaining his artistic practice.//The balance of $—————will be transferred from the artist's credit card account to that of the Collector." Lines for the signatures of Collector and Artist and the date follow.

Funny? Yes. Incisive? Yes again. Can the Collector be a patron? Can people invest in the artist's freedom to create, or only in the commodity of the artwork? Who appreciates the artist as a worker who must not only have food on the table, but space and the time for ideas to develop over uncluttered time? 

Larson implicitly asks where we think the art works come from? And the answer is not only from materials and a studio, as the IRS would have it. It's from a secure and nurtured person, a thinker and a worker secure in the value not only of great works, but of the experiments, essays, and time, time, time it takes to midwife them. One big question lingers in this work, though. It's not only framed, but under glass. No one can take the document and sign it, as one can contribute through the machine. Does Larsen have low expectations? He's already found his patron? Maybe Collectors want to think it over and have their attorneys add a few clauses?


 William E. Jones, Color Coordinated Currency (Green), 2012. Image courtesy of the artist and David Kordansky Gallery, Los Angeles, CA. Photo Brian Forrest. 

Thursday, September 5, 2013

"George Bellows and the American Experience" at the Columbus Museum of Art

The Columbus Museum of Art is proud of having the world's best collection of  George Bellows, a native son of this city, born in 1882. Visitors to George Bellows and the American Experience, running through January 4, 2014, will understand that the city claims the great artist not merely by virtue of an address at which he dwelt before achieving consciousness of the world beyond his toes. 

George Bellows, Portrait of My Father, 1906. Oil on canvas,
Unframed: 28 3/8 x 22 in.
Columbus Museum of Art, Gift of Howard B. Monett


The first gallery of this spectacular show documents Bellows' Columbus childhood and youth through photographs, clippings, and notebooks. He connived a way to disqualify himself from completing Ohio State so he could study art in New York, but the show displays many of his drawings and illustrations for Ohio State publicity and publications. Bellows played baseball and basketball for the Buckeyes and signed up to be rushed by fraternities—an unpleasant experience commemorated in edgy lithographs. James Thurber recognized Bellows as a presence  on campus.

Bellows painted commissioned portraits of a former Ohio State president and two eminent faculty members. On his own initiative he did a magnificent portrait of William Oxley Thompson, the president at the time. Though the University refused it because of the asking price, it won the portrait prize of the National Academy of Design in 1914. The painting eventually made its way to OSU anyway—to the William Oxley Thompson Library.

So Columbus claimed Bellows, and he claimed Columbus back. But when it comes down to it, we can make only a modest case that ties the spirit of so vast an artist to this place. If George Bellows and the American Experience has anything to demonstrate, it's Bellows'  magnitude and depth. We are shown how he puts his mastery of oil painting to use for a broad array of realistic subjects, from portraiture to cityscape, landscape and seascape, to social commentary, and sports. He paints tenement dwellers cooling on city docks and society mavens slumming it at banned boxing matches. His dramatic ocean views and his scenes of teeming New York streets are painted from the same almost divine heights. His portraits of his father, his wife and children, of famous men and street urchins are all delivered with equal spark and conviction of dignity. Bellows' command of color and painting technique run the gamut from almost entirely abstract (Polo at Lakewood, 1910to highly refined family portraits in the '20s.

Bellows lived only to the age of forty-three (he died in 1925), yet his painting alone has in it the sense of discovery and the range of a five or six-decade career—and not as in a single trajectory, but as occasion, invention, or spirit appear to have invited him to paint.

George Bellows, Polo at Lakewood, 1910. Oil on canvas. Unframed: 45.25 x 63.5." Columbus Museum of Art,
Columbus Art Association Purchase.
Polo at Lakewood is an immense canvas at almost four feet high and over six feet wide. If you can imagine standing in front of this image at that size, then imagine what brush strokes and daubs of paint form the cluster of women in the lower right corner, it won't take long to realize that they exist because they are fashioned as much from our expectations as from paint. On canvas, they are literally only a few unadorned, barely separated strokes of paint. But then, so is the whole painting. Shape, scale, placement, judicious use of light and dark: Those create action, drama, atmosphere, and time. The portrait of the artist's father, above, was painted in three hours; here, Bellows creates the illusion that the scene wasn't painted at all, but captured from the inside out—from its pounding heart—in the blink of an eye.

Stag at Sharkey’s, 1909. Oil on canvas, 36-3/16 x 48-1/4." The Cleveland Museum of Art. Hinman B. Hurlbut Collection 1133.1922.
As an athlete and as a painter drawn to every aspect of life as he found it, Bellows often drew and painted the action at the prizefighting club across the street from his New York. Prizefighting was illegal at the time and was promoted only at membership clubs like Sharkey's, so the lowlife subject was daring to begin with, and his painting of the entire scene dazzling. The entangled athletes composed of opposing forces and angles; the creation of immediate space with the ropes cutting across the action above our point of view and the backs of heads at our level; the blood-lust on the red faces opposite—we are almost sickeningly there. The dark, roiling sea of heads, the raw mountain of fighting flesh, and the stable island created by the ring: Add to these the magnificence of the composition with the hurricane of the emotion and movement, and we can begin to understand the impact this painting must have had in 1909. Stand in front of it today and feel your breath come shorter. How did you get in this situation? It's mesmerizing and appalling; real, tactile, and fleshy— so far beyond the stylized, technical violence we're used to as entertainment.
George Bellows, Blue Snow,The Battery,1910. Oil on canvas, unframed 34 x 44."
Columbus Museum of Art, Howald Fund Purchase.

Encouraged by his teacher, Robert Henri, to use the city as inspiration, Bellows responded to everything he saw. His canvases tend to communicate the teeming aspect of the city, its crowded abundance, its muscle, its individuals in anonymous environments. But in George Bellows and the American Experience we sense that he for the most part painted directly what he saw: If his paintings are packed with people, it's because that's what he found. In the case of "Blue Snow, The Battery," the vast snowfield at day's end, crisscrossed by home-bound workers is as genuine as it is breathtaking. 

I mention my sense of the scene's reality since the painting is so masterful a study in blue: Can such color occur in the real world? Can the tired end of a working day—can the mundane—be filled with such an otherworldly beauty? This is an essential question about Bellows, it seems: To what extent are his paintings transformative of perceived reality? Was this surpassingly beautiful blue vista there to be seen? I'm keeping my eyes open for others like it, to see what Bellows was alive to.
George Bellows, New York,1911. Oil on canvas. Overall: 42 x 60."
National Gallery of Art, Washington, Collection of Mr. and Mrs. Paul Mellon, 1986.72.1


New York depicts the same city, further uptown at the height of the business day. This isn't a day at the track, like Polo at Longwood. But more like Stag at Sharkey's, it's a scene  where Bellows studies action and resistance. Crowds of people lean into their brisk forward motion, in the foreground and in the midground at the base of the park. The stolid horses and fully loaded carts head in the opposite direction, upright and stalled. 

The tension of stop-and-go; the patchwork of dull colors among patchwork vertical and horizontal forms create a metallic puzzle in which humans strive. Yet Bellows keeps the painting lively with the brilliant flashes of light (the distant park; the near right corner bathed in a sunbeam) and color (the red-caped woman in the foreground, whose bright figure explodes the painting's sober palette). Though his technique is not quite as sketchy as in Polo at Longwood, this crammed, traffic-jammed city view is painted with similar suggestive, brisk technique: Very little is identified by more than a stroke or two. The whole world is suggested by size, placement, color, and direction of brushstrokes. Yet it is another masterpiece of realism.


George Bellows, Riverfront No. 1, 1915. Oil on canvas
Unframed: 45 3/8 x 63 1/8 in.
Columbus Museum of Art, Museum Purchase, Howald Fund


In this wonderful painting of the city's poor boys at their bathing beach—the riverfront docks—on a hot day, Bellows once again takes a low-life subject and exalts it with colors from a jewel box. The intensity of the blues; the extreme paleness of the boys' bodies; the explosive effect of the red hair and bathing suit turn our attention to the aesthetic aspects of the painting and divert it from the subject. Riverfront No. 1 struck me as a shift, in which Bellows' has stepped over a line he has been testing all along, that of revealing subjects with his painting, or vice versa. Neither this nor anything I've seen of his could be counted other than realist work, but there's a different emphasis, with less focus on the subject matter per se. Notes in the show explain Bellows' response to the 1913 Armory show bringing new directions from Europe; such emphasis on brilliant, saturated color had to have been one he responded to. 

For all of Bellows' prowess and experimentation as a painter, the Columbus show does not allow us to forget that he was the foremost lithographer of his day. In his work I see plenty that places him in honored comparison with Goya and Daumier, whose social and political passions were aggressively delineated on the litho stone. 

The scope of Bellows' subjects is broad, but the point of view is always sharp and satirical, or compassionate where little kindness is otherwise to be had. An obvious subject for satire was the art critical establishment. Although he took that world by storm, every professional deals with an establishment that wishes to be questioned by no one at all and considered supremely authoritative by all.
George Bellows, Artists Judging Works of Art (First State),1916. Lithograph. 
Unframed:14 5/8 x 19 in. Columbus Museum of Art, Howald Fund Purchase
In this print we again face a teeming world, something we find in Bellows' painting in association with the city's poor and underclass. Portraits set notable people apart. Masses are the opposite, depicting no one of particular account. Like other satirical printmakers, he puts individuals in grotesque and uncouth poses that reflect no self-awareness. "Judge not..." and so forth.

Bellows also depicts throngs of the unfortunate, in whose images he calls forth  compassion or indignation. The incarcerated insane are guilty of nothing but the misfortune of illness or trauma and are due nothing but our empathy, however peculiar and distressing their manners may be to us. In Dance in a Madhouse, Bellows 
George Bellows, Dance in a Madhouse, 1917, Lithograph.
Image: 18 1/4 x 24 1/4 in., Framed: 32 x 42 in.
Columbus Museum of Art, Gift of Mrs. George S. Munson

drew on his memory of just such an occasion, when he visited an insane asylum in Columbus with a friend whose mother was a matron there. The print shows a remarkable range of facial expressions. These reflect Bellows' great sensitivity to both the many frames of mind of the inhabitants, as well as to the ways visitors might react to them: with fear, compassion, or contempt. The vaulted shadow of the room impresses with a sense of doom that weighs down even the few instances of benign good spirits visible on inmate faces. It's worth noting similarities between the  angular postures of the dancers and the two critics in the left foreground of Artists Judging Works of Art. 

Another throng of inmates are the prisoners being blessed in Benediction in Georgia. One holds his head like the madwoman in the madhouse, evidently in utter despair. Where the asylum scene stirs strong feeling and every possible mixed emotion about the mad, this prison scene seems pointedly to enlist our sympathies for the prisoners, doomed to listen to
George Bellows,Benediction in Georgia (Second State), 1916. Lithograph.
Image: 16 1/8 x 20 in., Framed: 24 x 30 in. (Wood)
Columbus Museum of Art, Gift of Friends of Art
empty words of uplift from the respectable white preacher who can't keep even the seated guard upright. While the preacher's face is obscured, Bellows gives us poignant portraits of the several prisoners' strong faces, humanizing them and granting them intelligence. Hunched and shackled, with a world of space above them, we are urged to wonder about respectability's war on poverty, necessity, and race.


These three lithographs, like many in the show and like many of Bellows' paintings of New York City, are full of people. Through these scenes of masses he can call on a variety of emotions and tell a lot of stories, nearly always multi-faceted and complex. The White Hope is unusually blunt and single-minded in its satire. It makes me wonder if race was not an issue about which Bellows had particularly militant views. (Probably someone has written about this.) In Benediction in Georgia, all of the prisoners are Black. This would no doubt have been the case, as it very well may be today. But Bellows is careful in his depictions of faces, granting nobility to each, in contrast to the treatment of the guard at the desk, and the obscurity of the preacher. 

George Bellows, The White Hope,1921. Lithograph. Image: 15 1/8 x 
19 in., Unframed. Columbus Museum of Art, Museum Purchase, 
Mrs. H.B. Arnold Memorial Fund
In The White Hope, there are only three figures, two fighters and a referee. Unlike his custom in prizefighting paintings, Bellows does not bring our attention to the spectators who reflect the struggle: There is no struggle. The white fighter is down for the count, sitting in a posture of humiliated resignation. The Black boxer stands above him with an expression of cautious puzzlement—it's not fury or aggression on his brow.

The triangular composition is very simple, with the head of the Black contestant on the top and the folded legs and arms of the beaten "white hope" at the bottom. It can't get a lot simpler in any sense, so Bellows' anti-racist message is as clear as possible. His image is a single knockout blow.

Though the world—and the CMA giftshop—are filled with books about Bellows, I still regret that there is not a catalogue devoted to this particular show. It's high in didactic content and it would be wonderful to have a document and notes on the singular assembly of major works on loan from museums across the country. Still, all the more reason to plan to see the show before January, and to leave enough time to spend a few hours. George Bellows was a genius and every work in the show stops you in your tracks.